10-01-2009, 06:08 PM
I love this video its so simple and nostalgic its just like a group of friends hanging out and playing music. It doesnt have to be a big budget and fancy video to grab my attention.
(10-01-2009, 06:01 PM)cathb Wrote: [ -> ]--------------(10-01-2009, 04:16 PM)VAMPkito Wrote: [ -> ](10-01-2009, 04:06 PM)polarwhiteseal Wrote: [ -> ]Acoustic version is well.. acoustic. Very simple. It's raw. No camera on-board sound mic will do justice for any instruments out there. It's all unplugged so no instruments were individually recorded and mixed together. It's almost as if you're watching and listening to a recorded live from an audience who has their camera up. It sounds like crap. I see bands on youtube get rated down because people complain about sound quality and mock their talents when really, it is they(the youtube viewer) that don't understand that the camera can't capture all the sound clearly.That's no excuse for the CD version to be as subpar as it was. D:<
Like I said earlier, we all have our own opinions and one is not right and one is not wrong.
I see this version this way.....VAMPS was doing something and I (me/you/whoever) walked by the room. I said, "Oh, I just love Sweet Dreams! Would you please play it for me?" They obliged.
To me it is like sitting on the floor and getting a private live. There is no one else there...no cameras, no sound mixers, no managers, just you and the band in a very intimate setting. They are being totally natural and the song is as it is.
(10-01-2009, 06:01 PM)cathb Wrote: [ -> ]Like I said earlier, we all have our own opinions and one is not right and one is not wrong.I was talking about the CD version. This version in other words - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U58Th6wAVC0
I see this version this way.....VAMPS was doing something and I (me/you/whoever) walked by the room. I said, "Oh, I just love Sweet Dreams! Would you please play it for me?" They obliged.
To me it is like sitting on the floor and getting a private live. There is no one else there...no cameras, no sound mixers, no managers, just you and the band in a very intimate setting. They are being totally natural and the song is as it is.
(10-01-2009, 07:43 PM)VAMPkito Wrote: [ -> ](10-01-2009, 06:01 PM)cathb Wrote: [ -> ]Like I said earlier, we all have our own opinions and one is not right and one is not wrong.I was talking about the CD version. This version in other words - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U58Th6wAVC0
I see this version this way.....VAMPS was doing something and I (me/you/whoever) walked by the room. I said, "Oh, I just love Sweet Dreams! Would you please play it for me?" They obliged.
To me it is like sitting on the floor and getting a private live. There is no one else there...no cameras, no sound mixers, no managers, just you and the band in a very intimate setting. They are being totally natural and the song is as it is.
I love the PV version. But I don't like the CD's recycling of the same vocal tracks as the non-acoustic version, which makes it sound a tad awkward in the softer orchestral version.
(10-01-2009, 11:10 PM)VAMPkito Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't mean recycling the song in general. I generally don't mind that as long as it's few and far in between. What I meant was that the acoustic version used the same vocal track as the non-acoustic version, so it sounds awkward because they're two different sets of music.
Hurry Xmas is always just a limited time only single, isn't it? What I don't get is why they can't just release a permenent single release already so they wouldn't have to rerelease the single over and over again. I mean, aside from being able to reap in on the holiday profits, it seems like a financial loss on their part since a good amount of people already purchased the single the first two times (but then, the previous two versions didn't have live performances from the THEATER OF KISS concert)
(10-01-2009, 11:10 PM)VAMPkito Wrote: [ -> ]I didn't mean recycling the song in general. I generally don't mind that as long as it's few and far in between. What I meant was that the acoustic version used the same vocal track as the non-acoustic version, so it sounds awkward because they're two different sets of music.
Hurry Xmas is always just a limited time only single, isn't it? What I don't get is why they can't just release a permenent single release already so they wouldn't have to rerelease the single over and over again. I mean, aside from being able to reap in on the holiday profits, it seems like a financial loss on their part since a good amount of people already purchased the single the first two times (but then, the previous two versions didn't have live performances from the THEATER OF KISS concert)
(10-02-2009, 02:43 PM)polarwhiteseal Wrote: [ -> ]I think opinions are what forums are all about :) hope we didn't make any one feel uncomfortable. If I did I apologize.